Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 20:11
The facts, Malko! Check your facts again! I have a feeling that Wikipedia is incompatible with your Apple computer.Malko wrote:(as last of the group)
UEFA European Football Forum
For all discussions on European Football.
http://kassiesa.net/uefa/forum2/
The most accurate football ratings system available
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 15:20
well, for a club like Dortmund, beeing the one before the lastis the same as being the last, isn't it? It means : eliminated.
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 17:51
@Malko:
My interpretation of your prattling on the previous page is that Dortmund must win the French league to surpass the achievements of the French teams you name.
You're absolutely correct: using this criterion, Dortmund has done nothing.
And I leave you with that wise Spanish proverb,
"Con la ayuda de un vecino, maté un cochino." (Help him out if he doesn't get it, Executor!!)
My interpretation of your prattling on the previous page is that Dortmund must win the French league to surpass the achievements of the French teams you name.
You're absolutely correct: using this criterion, Dortmund has done nothing.
And I leave you with that wise Spanish proverb,
"Con la ayuda de un vecino, maté un cochino." (Help him out if he doesn't get it, Executor!!)
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 19:55
AlanK, the nothing meant : Nothing more than Montpellier. and that's true. They are both leading of their league and have good chances to be champions......and internationally, both did nothing at all.......Dortmund even twice.
So, Dortmund is "nothing more" than Montpellier.
So, Dortmund is "nothing more" than Montpellier.
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 04:58
Yeah were not the 204 best club in Europe.Greyn wrote:This ranking is just stupid, almost as stupid as IFFHS rankings.
Were at least in the top 20
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 18:42
In fact all those renkings are some "strange". Look even at the FIFA ranking of the national teams.
since last rankiing, France and germany played each one match:
Germany-France 0-2.
Now, germany gains one rank to get on Number 2 ! and France stays at its ranking without progressing. Where is the logic?
since last rankiing, France and germany played each one match:
Germany-France 0-2.
Now, germany gains one rank to get on Number 2 ! and France stays at its ranking without progressing. Where is the logic?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 19:37
Well, I could explain it to you...Malko wrote: Now, germany gains one rank to get on Number 2 ! and France stays at its ranking without progressing. Where is the logic?
But hey, you're a mathematician, you should be able to learn it yourself.
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 20:14
it would be possible if in the same time, better results for France would have been taken away as for germany. And...i doubt about that........or dif France beat Spain a year ago?
...
on another way, the elo-rating
http://clubelo.com/All/Ranking.html
is not up-todate. They say last Marseille-Game was on april 11, and they played and won the League-Cup on the 14th. Or does the Cup not count for rankings? This would be another stupid rule.....
...
on another way, the elo-rating
http://clubelo.com/All/Ranking.html
is not up-todate. They say last Marseille-Game was on april 11, and they played and won the League-Cup on the 14th. Or does the Cup not count for rankings? This would be another stupid rule.....
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 22:53
Not that stupid if you take into consideration the fact that the League Cup is not played in some countries, for example in Poland. It would gave an additional advantage for the teams which participate in this kind of competition.Malko wrote: on another way, the elo-rating
http://clubelo.com/All/Ranking.html
is not up-todate. They say last Marseille-Game was on april 11, and they played and won the League-Cup on the 14th. Or does the Cup not count for rankings? This would be another stupid rule.....