A is a subset of B if any member of A is also a member of B.
So if A is “the correct predictions of Adam” and it has 10 elements and B is “the correct predictions of Bethany” and it has 13 elements then A isn’t necessarily a subset of B.
A=(Krasnodar, Rennes, Slavia Prague, Zenit, Arsenal, Benfica, Sevilla, Dynamo Kiev, Inter, Valencia)
B=(Zenit, Arsenal, Benfica, Sevilla, Dynamo Kiev, Inter, Valencia, Salzburg, Chelsea, Frankfurt, Villarreal, Dinamo Zagreb, Napoli)
A isn’t a subset of B here, A has 3 elements that B hasn’t (Krasnodar, Rennes, Slavia Prague) and B has 6 elements that A hasn’t (Salzburg, Chelsea, Frankfurt, Villarreal, Dinamo Zagreb, Napoli)
From these 9 matches, Adam won 50€, Bethany lost 91€. In the remaining 7 they got the same score.
But sure, “10” < “13”…
Your “10” is a subset of Bethany’s “13”. Adam’s may not be.
Bethany isn’t an idiot; she’s a devoted follower of her #Godds. (And this time her #Godds haven’t disappointed her.)og2002gr wrote:To me Bethany is an idiot.
Why bet on odds around 1.00? There is no value there!