I can't see this. Anyone else with the same problem?dnina10 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 04:54 https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av5EGqq140H7oh0dLLF ... 0?e=6GsK1j
It is finally out. My spreadsheet has now gone live.
Seeding for UEFA Club Competitions 2024/25
International break hater
I have an issue as well I get “This item might not exist or is no longer available”matt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 23:01I can't see this. Anyone else with the same problem?dnina10 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 04:54 https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av5EGqq140H7oh0dLLF ... 0?e=6GsK1j
It is finally out. My spreadsheet has now gone live.
Try to visit his profile and scroll down to the thread that way.
Apologies, I have a new link to the spreadsheet. You'll find it below. I do apologize, I forgot to add it hereSagy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 23:57I have an issue as well I get “This item might not exist or is no longer available”matt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 23:01I can't see this. Anyone else with the same problem?dnina10 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 04:54 https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av5EGqq140H7oh0dLLF ... 0?e=6GsK1j
It is finally out. My spreadsheet has now gone live.
https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av5EGqq140H7zUpUe0e ... I?e=Le4b3c
Thanks. This one worksdnina10 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2024 15:57Apologies, I have a new link to the spreadsheet. You'll find it below. I do apologize, I forgot to add it here
https://1drv.ms/x/s!Av5EGqq140H7zUpUe0e ... I?e=Le4b3c
Great results for PAOK yesterday, and they were not even playing.
Young Boys, the biggest threat currently in the CL-W rebalancing rankings, almost eliminated (1-3 at home vs. Sporting).
Sparta Prague lost in Constantinople (3-2 to Galatasaray) and should focus on the league, whereas Slavia is already qualified to the R16.
Although Galatasaray is leading in Turkey and is the second team behind PAOK (31.500 vs 35.000), it looks unlikely they'll be able to surpass the Greek team.
Slovan Bratislava eliminated (4-1 vs Sturm in Graz).
Shakhtar also alive after the first leg vs. Marseille.
I want them to go as far as possible, which should distract them from the league.
Only "unfortunate" result was Qarabag thrashing Braga away.
Young Boys, the biggest threat currently in the CL-W rebalancing rankings, almost eliminated (1-3 at home vs. Sporting).
Sparta Prague lost in Constantinople (3-2 to Galatasaray) and should focus on the league, whereas Slavia is already qualified to the R16.
Although Galatasaray is leading in Turkey and is the second team behind PAOK (31.500 vs 35.000), it looks unlikely they'll be able to surpass the Greek team.
Slovan Bratislava eliminated (4-1 vs Sturm in Graz).
Shakhtar also alive after the first leg vs. Marseille.
I want them to go as far as possible, which should distract them from the league.
Only "unfortunate" result was Qarabag thrashing Braga away.
-
soyderedstarbelgrade
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2021 22:51
- Location: Podgorica - Belgrade
What needs to happen for Serbia N2 to start in Q3 league path instead of Q2?
Volim je do ludila
Basically the same thing as in recent years, for there to be a vacancy in CL Q3 (non champions path). While not yet official, it's very possible that the clubs with the higher coefficients due to start in that round will take the vacated spotsoyderedstarbelgrade wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 20:26 What needs to happen for Serbia N2 to start in Q3 league path instead of Q2?
Comparing 2024/25 UCL champions path access list: https://kassiesa.net/uefa/AccessList2024.html
and @dnina10 spreadsheet, did I understand correctly:
1. Because Russia will be banned, SWE and POL are skipping from Q1 to Q2 because of their national coefficient. Other placements stay the same.
2. If this seasons UCL TH secures GS through their league, champion with highest club coefficient from qualifiers secures GS directly, and rebalancing will be done depending on club coefficient (in simulation, Young Boys gets directly to GS, subsequently Qarabag and Slovan move from Q1 to Q2, and Bodo/Glimt moves from Q2 to PO)
Is that everything regarding UCL champions path or did I miss something?
and @dnina10 spreadsheet, did I understand correctly:
1. Because Russia will be banned, SWE and POL are skipping from Q1 to Q2 because of their national coefficient. Other placements stay the same.
2. If this seasons UCL TH secures GS through their league, champion with highest club coefficient from qualifiers secures GS directly, and rebalancing will be done depending on club coefficient (in simulation, Young Boys gets directly to GS, subsequently Qarabag and Slovan move from Q1 to Q2, and Bodo/Glimt moves from Q2 to PO)
Is that everything regarding UCL champions path or did I miss something?
That is correct. This is how @dnina10's spreadsheet does it.
@dnina10 was told that rebalancing now will be based on club ranking instead for next season.
However, we don't know for sure if e.g. clubs from Q2 and Q1 will be considered for an empty UCL play-off (champions path) spot, or if only Q2 clubs will be considered. @dnina10 thinks the former will be the case.
However, we don't know for sure if e.g. clubs from Q2 and Q1 will be considered for an empty UCL play-off (champions path) spot, or if only Q2 clubs will be considered. @dnina10 thinks the former will be the case.
Corrections I think the latter will be the case, based on discussions I've hadFotcalc wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 15:34 @dnina10 was told that rebalancing now will be based on club ranking instead for next season.
However, we don't know for sure if e.g. clubs from Q2 and Q1 will be considered for an empty UCL play-off (champions path) spot, or if only Q2 clubs will be considered. @dnina10 thinks the former will be the case.
Yes. I thought I had written this in the opposite order. My mistake, David.
For example, if the servette is eliminated in the 3rd round of the European League, does he participate in the conference league play-off round with his own coefficient or with the points of the team he was eliminated from? In this case, the Excel file seems to be faulty.
..