UEFA European Football Forum

amenina wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2024 21:35 Petrocub are Moldova champions and qualified for CL-Q1.

First time champion, first Champions League qualification.

Which secures CLQ2 seeding for Malmo FF. APOEL will be seeded if Dortmund doesn't win CL.

Spreadsheet updated with the same rebalancing logic as @eye's excellent spreadsheet.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =217607255

This Malmo team will be very interesting to follow in Europe. Don't remember seeing a Swedish team this dominant since Gothenburg in the 1990s.

Ferencvaros, Qarabag, Slovan, Bodo, Czech Champion, Ludogorets, Lech Poznan, Olympiacos or PAOK, Dinamo Zagreb, Maccabi Tel Aviv, Sheriff and Copenhagen are 12 teams and TH is not yet confirmed to qualify through league. Yes, sorry, this is under the assumption that the CLTH will qualify via the le...

CoL will still be more rewarding for clubs from lower ranked leagues who are unlikely to progress from the EL LP anyway.

Cluj can no longer win the championship in Romania. This should guarantee seeding for Malmö FF in CLQ2. Please correct me if I am wrong!

I noticed that @bert.kassies has Malmo FF confirmed seeded in CLQ2 on this page: https://kassiesa.net/uefa/seedcl2024.html What is that based on? I was under the impression that they can still be surpassed (hence bumped down to unseeded) by Dinamo, Cluj, Sheriff, Copenhagen/Midtjylland and Lech if ...

Hi @eye, I noticed that your access list has changed to now have 30 clubs in CLQ1. What is the reason for this?

EDIT: I only just now realised that Benfica is somehow in CLPO as well. Perhaps something has broken in the spreadsheet.

I noticed that bert.kassies has Malmo FF confirmed seeded in CLQ2 on this page: https://kassiesa.net/uefa/seedcl2024.html What is that based on? I was under the impression that they can still be surpassed (hence bumped down to unseeded) by Dinamo, Cluj, Sheriff, Copenhagen/Midtjylland and Lech if al...

That's a good formulation! I believe that the best way to go about 2+3, is to let the the unseeded the the highest Elo draw the seeded with the highest coefficients , since it is the most likely out of all unseeded teams to beat that seeded team (or other seeded teams as well). This is now implemen...

Yes, I do have a good reason, the whole premise of the Sheet is that a team with more lower Elo opponents is more likely to win in that round. But in practice it's probabilistic, and the more such teams there are, the more likely it is, including against more seeded teams in the next round. What I ...

With so much coefficient ‘inheritance’ between qualification rounds and tournaments, I’m planning on implementing a label that shows from what team and round a club’s coefficient has been inherited. [Update] I have now implemented this for UCL and UEL. I've added a column for coefficient, and for t...

With so much coefficient ‘inheritance’ between qualification rounds and tournaments, I’m planning on implementing a label that shows from what team and round a club’s coefficient has been inherited. [Update] I have now implemented this for UCL and UEL. I've added a column for coefficient, and for t...

With so much coefficient ‘inheritance’ between qualification rounds and tournaments, I’m planning on implementing a label that shows from what team and round a club’s coefficient has been inherited.

amirbachar wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:11 They use 25.5, the higher one of the actual teams.

That's easy -- then no changes required to the spreadsheet.

amirbachar wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:16 Thank you
BTW, There is a bug with the average and median Elo.

Thanks for flagging - fixed.