UEFA Champions League 2022/23 3rd qualifying round

Champions League, Europa League, Conference League
User avatar
nogomet
Senior Member
Posts: 7305
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 17:28
Location: Zagreb

Post by nogomet »

Dinamo will be looking to avoid Ferencvaros. Everything else would be considered OK, though they'd be favorites against all available opponents.

I root for them to draw Apollon, I like when our teams play new opponents. Ludogorets and Ferencvaros would be too repetitive.
User avatar
nogomet
Senior Member
Posts: 7305
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 17:28
Location: Zagreb

Post by nogomet »

Juliusz wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:07 Are they crazy? Q2 groups were already unbalanced, but this... :sigh:
I don't see it that way.

From the perspective of unseeds, we knew that one group will need to have two of the three Q3 heavyweights (Dinamo, Oly, Zvezda), while the other will have only one of them, so no surprises there. Seeds are as balanced as you can get.

From the perspective of seeds, only one group could get a jackpot in the form of Diddeleng/Pyunik. Two of the strongest unseeds Ferencvaros and Glimt have been equally distributed, one group got each. And the rest (Ludo, Apollon, Sheriff/Maribor) is not unbalanced any way you distribute them.
Juliusz
Senior Member
Posts: 3401
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:30
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Post by Juliusz »

nogomet wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:21
Juliusz wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:07 Are they crazy? Q2 groups were already unbalanced, but this... :sigh:
I don't see it that way.

From the perspective of unseeds, we knew that one group will need to have two of the three Q3 heavyweights (Dinamo, Oly, Zvezda), while the other will have only one of them, so no surprises there. Seeds are as balanced as you can get.

From the perspective of seeds, only one group could get a jackpot in the form of Diddeleng/Pyunik. Two of the strongest unseeds Ferencvaros and Glimt have been equally distributed, one group got each. And the rest (Ludo, Apollon, Sheriff/Maribor) is not unbalanced any way you distribute them.
From my point of view, Diddeleng / Pyunik and Sheriff / Maribor in one group are already a jackpot for the seeds. And these two are in the same group as Žalgiris / Malmö and HJK / Viktoria, which I consider the two weakest seeds.

I understand that a perfect balance is impossible to achieve in this round, but that's the way it is with just 12 teams. I just mean that (IMO) the two weakest seeds and two weakest unseeds are in the same group.
User avatar
nogomet
Senior Member
Posts: 7305
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 17:28
Location: Zagreb

Post by nogomet »

Juliusz wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:27 From my point of view, Diddeleng / Pyunik and Sheriff / Maribor in one group are already a jackpot for the seeds. And these two are in the same group as Žalgiris / Malmö and HJK / Viktoria, which I consider the two weakest seeds.
I don't see why would Qarabag/Zürich be considered stronger than either of Viktoria Plzen or Malmö, but views obviously differ.

As for Sheriff/Maribor, I don't think that pair is as weak as most people think it is.
User avatar
wannabeontop
Senior Member
Posts: 1348
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:27

Post by wannabeontop »

Zürich would be terrible to get after what YB did to Ferencváros. The Israeli/Greek champions would be an O.K. draw after all.
In Game of Thrones conquerors always say to the defeated side: "Bend the knee and you''ll live". As if they weren't alive right now.

I'm smarter than it shows. Just don't want to discourage anyone.
Juliusz
Senior Member
Posts: 3401
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:30
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Post by Juliusz »

nogomet wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:31
Juliusz wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:27 From my point of view, Diddeleng / Pyunik and Sheriff / Maribor in one group are already a jackpot for the seeds. And these two are in the same group as Žalgiris / Malmö and HJK / Viktoria, which I consider the two weakest seeds.
I don't see why would Qarabag/Zürich be considered stronger than either of Viktoria Plzen or Malmö, but views obviously differ.

As for Sheriff/Maribor, I don't think that pair is as weak as most people think it is.
I know that Qarabag didn't show their best display vs Lech, but despite that they beat them badly. FC Zurich is an unknown for me, but with a high potential I guess.

I believe that Malmö is not doing well recently, both domestically and in Europe. It's hard to rate Viktoria properly, but I'm concerned about their last European performances. If it was Slavia - then sure, one of the strongest seeds, but I have a feeling that Viktoria is a lower level despite winning the league ahead of them.

Your remark about Sheriff / Maribor pairing might be true, although, after many departures, I don't see Sheriff repeating their last qualifying campaign. It was kind of a miracle then, but how probable is that they repeat it, since it was high above their level? :upset:

Anyway, it seems, that again kind of North / South splitting was applied?
OlliWender
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon May 03, 2021 22:31
Location: Germany

Post by OlliWender »

I think Zürich will be a midtable swiss team again after losing Breitenreiter and some key players, so I don't see them strong at all.
User avatar
wannabeontop
Senior Member
Posts: 1348
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:27

Post by wannabeontop »

OlliWender wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:53 I think Zürich will be a midtable swiss team again after losing Breitenreiter and some key players, so I don't see them strong at all.
Could you elaborate which key players left and when? I know I know, I could look it up but if you know it by heart, then that's super. :D
In Game of Thrones conquerors always say to the defeated side: "Bend the knee and you''ll live". As if they weren't alive right now.

I'm smarter than it shows. Just don't want to discourage anyone.
OlliWender
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon May 03, 2021 22:31
Location: Germany

Post by OlliWender »

wannabeontop wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 17:03
OlliWender wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:53 I think Zürich will be a midtable swiss team again after losing Breitenreiter and some key players, so I don't see them strong at all.
Could you elaborate which key players left and when? I know I know, I could look it up but if you know it by heart, then that's super. :D
Top scorer Assan Ceesay went to Lecce, Ousmane Doumbia to Lugano. I thought Gnonto, 18 year old great talent left too, he's still there but will almost certainly leave too. Omeragic is another talent they might lose.
User avatar
wannabeontop
Senior Member
Posts: 1348
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:27

Post by wannabeontop »

OlliWender wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 17:12
wannabeontop wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 17:03
OlliWender wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:53 I think Zürich will be a midtable swiss team again after losing Breitenreiter and some key players, so I don't see them strong at all.
Could you elaborate which key players left and when? I know I know, I could look it up but if you know it by heart, then that's super. :D
Top scorer Assan Ceesay went to Lecce, Ousmane Doumbia to Lugano. I thought Gnonto, 18 year old great talent left too, he's still there but will almost certainly leave too. Omeragic is another talent they might lose.
Apparently drawing Zürich wouldn't so bad after all. Thanks man, appreciate it!
In Game of Thrones conquerors always say to the defeated side: "Bend the knee and you''ll live". As if they weren't alive right now.

I'm smarter than it shows. Just don't want to discourage anyone.
User avatar
nogomet
Senior Member
Posts: 7305
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 17:28
Location: Zagreb

Post by nogomet »

Zürich was a bad draw if you were seeded in CL-Q2. Zürich cannot be considered a bad draw if you're unseeded in CL-Q3.
bugylibicska
Senior Member
Posts: 30802
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 17:21
Location: Canada

Post by bugylibicska »

dnina10 wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 15:52 Champions path
The Champions path features to new entrants and ten second qualifying round winners (Champions path). Teams have been divided into two groups and seeded in accordance with the club coefficient ranking (the higher coefficient of the two clubs involved in an undecided pairing).

Group 1
Seeded:
Match 1 Dinamo Zagreb (CRO) / Shkupi (MKD)
Match 2 Maccabi Haifa (ISR) / Olympiacos (GRE)
Match 3 Qarabağ (AZE) / Zürich (SUI)

Unseeded:
Match 4 Ludogorets (BUL) / Shamrock Rovers (IRL)
Match 5 Ferencváros (HUN) / Slovan Bratislava (SVK)
Apollon Limassol (CYP)

Group 2
Seeded:
Crvena zvezda (SRB)
Match 6 HJK Helsinki (FIN) / Viktoria Plzeň (CZE)
Match 7 Žalgiris (LTU) / Malmö (SWE)

Unseeded:
Match 8 Maribor (SVN) / Sheriff (MDA)
Match 9 Linfield (NIR) / Bodø/Glimt (NOR)
Match 10 Pyunik (ARM) / Diddeleng (LUX)

Groups are out
I'm sure somebody will try to explain the wisdom behind this circus. I don't want Fradi for Qarabag, but I'd probably choose Qarabağ (AZE) / Zürich (SUI) for Fradi. I think Crvena Zvezda won't complain.
User avatar
Firnen
Senior Member
Posts: 12210
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 21:32

Post by Firnen »

Very unbalanced Groups.

For Olympiacos, I want a re-match with Ludogorets.

For Apollon, I want Qarabag/Zurich.
User avatar
air
Posts: 805
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 05:57
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by air »

wannabeontop wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 16:39 Zürich would be terrible to get after what YB did to Ferencváros. The Israeli/Greek champions would be an O.K. draw after all.
I think Zürich/Qarabag would be the "easiest" draw :smile1: Although there are no big differences between these teams.
User avatar
air
Posts: 805
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 05:57
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by air »

If I am not wrong, this whole grouping was needed to seperate Qarabag and Pyunik. They could simply start the draw with Qarabag, and adding all unseeded except Pyunik into a hat to be drawn.

And then continue with no groups.
Post Reply